New York: Legislation To Expand Medical Marijuana Program Doesn’t Garner Enough Support

Lawmakers failed to pass any meaningful legislation to significantly expand the state’s current medical marijuana program before the legislative ended on June 16th. Read below for more information on all of the legislation that was introduced this legislative session but failed to garner enough support to pass:

Assembly Bill 9151 called on the Department of Health to double the number of state-licensed medical cannabis producers and dispensaries. These new facilities would have been located in underserved regions of the state.

Assembly Bill 9507 would have removed the cap on the number of companies that are permitted to produce and sell the medicine. The bill also sought to repeal the requirement that registered organizations be vertically integrated. 

Assembly Bill 9510/S 6998 would have expanded the pool of medical professionals who can provide written recommendations for marijuana to qualifying patients. The legislation would have allowedd physician assistants and nurse practitioners who are in good standing with the state to participate in the program. 

Assembly Bill 9514 sought to expand the list of qualifying conditions, adding severe chronic pain. A list of current qualifying conditions can be found here

Assembly Bill 9517 sought to allow marijuana to be smoked for medical use. Currently only non-smokable preparations are allowed. 

Assembly Bill 9553/S 7000 sought to establish an advisory committee to assist the Commissioner of Health in the implementation of the New York’s medical marijuana law and also direct the program to recognize visiting patients’ out-of-state medical marijuana certifications.

Assembly Bill 9562/S 6999 would have added eight qualifying medical conditions and lifts the THC dosage limits on medical marijuana. 

Senate Bill 7042 sought to allow registered organizations (producers) to contact healthcare providers directly to educate them about the medical use of marijuana as well as doubles the number of dispensaries currently-licensed producers are allowed to operate from four to eight. 

New York legalized medical marijuana in 2014, however the law is one of the most restrictive in the country. This legislation would have significantly increased access to those patients who so desperately need it.
NORML would like to thank those of you who contacted your state lawmakers in support of this legislation.
For additional information on this legislation and other pending reforms, contact the Empire State NORML Chapter or Compassionate Care NY

National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws – Advocacy Campaigns

Categories: Industrial Hemp Legislation | Tags: , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

America Can Learn A Lot From Portugal’s Drug Policy

C1_8734_r_xSince 1996, when California voters approved the medical use of marijuana, most of the high-profile political progress that has been made towards legalizing marijuana has been made in the United States. And starting with Colorado and Washington, all of the full legalization experiments have been homegrown.

But that does not mean we should not be looking to other countries for successful experiments and policies. Drug use and abuse is worldwide, so the solution to the destructive war on drug users must also be worldwide.

The Portugal Experiment

In 2001, the Portugal legislature bravely enacted a comprehensive form of drug decriminalization, in which all criminal penalties were removed for personal drug possession and use offenses — reclassifying them as administrative violations. Instead of arresting individuals in possession of personal-use amounts of any drug, defined as less than a ten-day supply of any drug — a gram of heroin, ecstasy, or amphetamine; two-grams of cocaine; or 25 grams of marijuana — they are now given a violation and ordered to appear before a rather ominous sounding “dissuasion commission.”

The possession of larger amounts of drugs and drug sales continue to be criminal matters for which an offender is subject to arrest and prosecution.

The “dissuasion commission,” which is comprised of one local legal official and two health and social service professionals, first determines whether the individual is addicted, and if so to what degree. It then determines whether the individual is referred to a voluntary treatment program, given a fine, or receives other administrative sanctions. The majority of cases are simply suspended, and the violator receives no sanction. According to Nuno Capaz, a sociologist who serves on the Lisbon “dissuasion panel,” between 80 and 85 percent of the people who are referred to the panels today are caught with hashish or cannabis.

For persistent offenders, or those identified as addicts, these panels can order sanctions or treatment, and recreational users may face fines or community service. If an addict refuses treatment, they are required to check in regularly with their family doctor (Portugal has a free national healthcare program), and if they fail, the local police remind them of their obligation. And those running the Portuguese system attribute this close working relationship between the police and the public health officials as crucial to their success. “This small change actually makes a huge change in terms of police officers’ work,” says Capaz. “Of course, every policy officer knows where people hang out to smoke joints. If they wanted to they would just go there and pick up the same guy over and over. That doesn’t happen.”

Flying in the face of the more prevalent “lock-em-up and throw-away-the-key” anti-drug policies popular at the time in most countries, especially the United States, there were initially fears that Portugal would become overrun with heroin addicts from all over Europe, and the government received a lot of criticism for their experimental policy from such staid groups as the International Narcotics Control Board – part of the UN drug convention system.

What Decriminalization Really Means

Decriminalization was a half-way measure originally recommended for marijuana policy in the U.S. by the National Commission on Marijuana and Drug Abuse in 1972. It says consumers, who generally comprise up to 90 percent of the marijuana arrests, should be removed from the criminal justice system, but that commercial sales of marijuana should remain illegal. While that is obviously an improvement over total prohibition, where users are also subject to arrest and jail, it generally is thought to lead to an increase in demand without any legal supply — a boon to the illegal black market and those willing to take the risk to sell to the newly legal consumers.

Seventeen states in the U.S. have enacted a version of marijuana decriminalization (some have eliminated all penalties for minor possession offenses; others have reduced the penalty to a fine-only). But more recently states that wish to end prohibition have looked toward full legalization, where the commercial market is regulated and taxed. Nonetheless, decriminalization remains an option for those states that no longer wish to treat smokers as criminals, but do not yet feel politically comfortable with full legalization.

Not The Results In Portugal That Were Expected

But the results from Portugal seem to dispel those initial fears that decriminalizing drugs would result in an increase in dangerous drug use, especially among addicts.

First, and most importantly, decriminalization in Portugal for a decade and a half has not led to any major increases in the rate of drug use. There were minor increases in drug use during the initial year (2001), but the rates of drug use after that have not changed significantly, or, in some cases, have actually declined since 2001, and remain below the average rates in both Europe and the United States. And importantly, adolescent use, and use by people who are deemed “dependent” or who inject drugs, has decreased in Portugal since 2003.

So decriminalization may yet prove to be an attractive alternative to prohibition for the more dangerous drugs in the United States. No one wants to see a cocaine store on the corner, but neither do most people want to ruin an individual’s life with a long prison sentence for the use of cocaine. If it is a problem, it is a medical one, not a criminal justice problem.

And Portugal has experienced more than a 60 percent decrease in the number of people arrested and prosecuted for drug offenses. More than 80 percent of the cases coming before the “dissuasion commissions” are perceived to have no problems and receive no sanction.

The percentage of prisoners in Portuguese prisons for drug offenses has been reduced from a high of 44 percent to the current rate of 13 percent. And drug overdose deaths have decreased from 80 in 2001 to 16 in 2012. In the U.S., for comparison, more than 14,000 people died from prescription opioid overdoses alone each year.

“There is no doubt that the phenomenon of addiction is in decline in Portugal,” Portugal’s Drug Czar Dr. Joao Goulão explained, according to Drug Policy Alliance. He attributed this shift to “a set of policies that target reduction of both supply and demand, including measures of prevention, treatment, harm reduction and social reinsertion.” Adding that, “[t]he biggest effect has been to allow the stigma of drug addiction to fall, to let people speak clearly and to pursue professional help without fear.”

And he strongly favors a policy of harm reduction. “I think harm reduction is not giving up on people,” Dr. Goulão said, according to Vice, “…assuming that even if someone is still using drugs, that person deserves the investment of the state in order to have a better and longer life.”

And even the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime has concluded that “Portugal’s policy has reportedly not led to an increase in drug tourism. It also appears that a number of drug-related problems has decreased.” And some leading independent researchers investigating the Portugal experiment wrote in the British Journal of Criminology in 2010 that “contrary to predictions, the Portuguese decriminalization did not lead to major increases in drug use. Indeed, evidence indicates reductions in problematic use drug-related harms and criminal justice overcrowding.”

So What Can We Learn From Portugal

First, we can begin to stop treating so harshly illicit drug users, who use something other than marijuana. Sure heroin and cocaine and methamphetamine are more potentially dangerous than marijuana; but that does not mean those drug users should be treated like criminals. If, like Portugal, we can minimize abuse, greatly reduce the number of people arrested on drug charges, reduce overdose deaths, reduce adolescent drug use and problematic drug abuse, greatly reduce our prison population, and still maintain a safe, free and open society, then why would we not want to begin to move in that direction?

Also, we can learn from Portugal the importance of adopting a policy of harm reduction that recognizes the value of all lives, including those who may, for a time, use dangerous drugs, and to provide needed mental health services to those whom we can identify as problem drug abusers. Portugal seems to make it clear that their success simply could not have been possible without making health care professionals available to those who will avail themselves of that help.

And third, we can and should learn that the stigma of drug use or abuse — regardless of the drug involved — needs to be eliminated, to create an environment in which individuals feel free to seek help without fear of being labeled a bad person. It’s time to treat drug abuse as a medical issue, not primarily a criminal justice issue.

NORML Blog, Marijuana Law Reform

Categories: Hemp History | Tags: , , , , , | Leave a comment

Alabama: Lawmakers Fail To Act On Marijuana Decriminalization Measure

This legislative session, members of the House Judiciary Committee failed to consider House Bill 257, legislation to amend state law so that first time offenders of one ounce or less of marijuana face a civil fine, no arrest and no criminal record.

Current law defines the personal possession of marijuana as a Class A misdemeanor, punishable by up to a year in jail and a fine up of to $ 6,000. 

The collateral damage of being convicted of a cannabis crime can be life altering, including the loss of financial aid for students, exclusion from low income housing, deportation and adverse consequences for future employment. 

This legislation was a fiscally sensible proposal that would have enabled police, prosecutors, and the courts to reallocate their existing resources toward activities that will better serve the public.

NORML would like to thank those of you who contacted your state lawmakers in support of this legislation. 

National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws – Advocacy Campaigns

Categories: Industrial Hemp Legislation | Tags: , , , , , | Leave a comment

Tennessee: Legislation To Offer Citation Instead of Arrest Fails To Garner Support Before Session Ends

Lawmakers failed to pass legislation this legislative session that would have placed a referendum before voters this November to provide local law enforcement the option of citing rather than arresting adults who are caught in possession of one ounce or less of marijuana.

House Bill 2310 was approved by members of the House Criminal Justice Subcommittee on March 22nd and the full House Criminal Justice Committee on March 30th. However, it did not make it past the House Calendar and Rules committee. 

Senate Bill 2321 was defeated in the Senate Judiciary committee on May 12th. 

Under present law, the possession of up to one half ounce of marijuana is classified as a criminal misdemeanor — punishable by up to one-year in jail and a fine between $ 250 and $ 500. 
An analysis of 2012 marijuana possession arrests reports that police annually arrest over 19,000 Tennesseans for minor marijuana possession offenses. This is the 15th highest statewide tally in the nation.

Minor marijuana possession offenders, many of them young people, should not be saddled with a criminal record and the lifelong penalties and stigma associated with it. 

NORML would like to thank those of you who contacted your state lawmakers in support of this common sense legislation. 

Additional information on these and other pending efforts is available from Tennessee NORML

National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws – Advocacy Campaigns

Categories: Industrial Hemp Legislation | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Oregon: Governor Signs Measure Allowing Retail Sale of Marijuana Extracts and Edibles

Governor Kate Brown has signed legislation, Senate Bill 1511, allowing adults 21 and older to immediately become eligible to purchase marijuana extracts and marijuana infused edibles from Oregon dispensaries. 

In 2014, residents in Oregon voted to legalize the adult use and retail sale of herbal marijuana. Senate Bill 1511 legally permits adults to also purchase limited quantities of cannabis-infused products, such as edibles and extracts. 

Under the new law, dispensary operators may sell a single low-dose unit of an edible and the equivalent of a vaporizer pen containing a marijuana extract to any person 21 and older. Dispensaries may also legally sell non-psychoactive products intended for use on a person’s hair or skin.

Read the full text of the enrolled bill here.

National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws – Advocacy Campaigns

Categories: Industrial Hemp Legislation | Tags: , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Massachusetts: Lawmakers Fail To Act On Measure To Regulate Hemp Commerce

Lawmakers failed to act this session on legislation, House Bill 773, to regulate the cultivation and promotion of industrial hemp.

The legislation would have established policies and procedures to allow for the commercial cultivation of industrial hemp if/when federal law permits such activity.

Members of Congress have previously approved language in the omnibus federal Farm Bill explicitly authorizing states to sponsor hemp research absent federal reclassification of the plant. Presently, more than 20 states have enacted legislation permitting licensed hemp cultivation in a manner that is compliant with this statute.

Under this proposal, state regulators would have licensed applicants to engage in hemp-related activities, including acquiring germinating hemp seeds and crop cultivation.

NORML would like to thank those of you who contacted your state lawmakers in support of this legislation. 

For more information you can contact our Mass/Cann NORML Chapter

National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws – Advocacy Campaigns

Categories: Industrial Hemp Legislation | Tags: , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Alabama: Governor Signs Bill to Expand CBD Access

Governor Robert Bentley has signed legislation, House Bill 61, to protect qualified patients eligible for CBD therapy under a physician’s authorization from criminal prosecution.

The measure, known as ‘Leni’s Law’, will allow qualified patients to possess CBD preparations containing up to three percent THC. The measure passed in the Senate by a vote of 29 to 3 and in the House in a 95 to 4 vote. While existing state law permits qualified patients to use CBD if they are part of state-sponsored clinical trial, this measure will legally protect qualified patients who possess the substance outside of a clinical trial environment.

The new law takes effect June 1st, 2016. 

National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws – Advocacy Campaigns

Categories: Industrial Hemp Legislation | Tags: , , , , , | Leave a comment

Louisiana: Governor Signs Legislation Amending State’s Dormant Medical Marijuana Law, Immunizing Patients

Governor John Bel Edwards signed legislation on Thursday, May 19th amending the state’s dormant medical marijuana law.

Senate Bill 271 permits physicians to ‘recommend’ rather than ‘prescribe’ medical cannabis therapy. The change allows doctors to authorize cannabis without running afoul of federal law, which prohibits the prescription of a schedule I controlled substance.

The measure also expands the pool of conditions eligible for cannabis therapy to include the following: “cancer, positive status for human immunodeficiency virus, acquired immune deficiency syndrome, cachexia or wasting syndrome, seizure disorders, epilepsy, spasticity, Crohn’s disease, muscular dystrophy, or multiple sclerosis.”

The bill does not amend language in the state’s Therapeutic Research Act limiting the preparation of medicinal cannabis products to non-herbal formulations, nor does it address provisions limiting state-licensed cannabis cultivation to a single provider, or the dispensing of cannabis products to no more than ten licensed pharmacies. Those restrictions were put in place by legislation signed into law last year. 

The Governor has also signed separate legislation, SB 180, which explicitly immunizes the program’s participants from state criminal prosecution. Senate Bill 180 takes effect on August 1, 2016. You can read the new law here.

Senate Bill 271 does include language requiring the Louisiana State University Agricultural Center and the Southern University Agricultural Center to decide whether or not they wish to seek licensing to grow medical marijuana for the state’s program by September 2, 2016.

You can read the enrolled measure here.

National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws – Advocacy Campaigns

Categories: Industrial Hemp Legislation | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

California: Legislation To Impose Cultivation Tax On Medical Marijuana Pending

Legislation is pending in the Senate that seeks to impose new taxes on the production and purchase of medical cannabis.

Senate Bill 987 imposes a special 15 percent statewide tax upon medical marijuana sales. This tax would be in addition to the imposition of existing state and local taxes.

Assembly Bill 2243 imposes a new $ 9.75/ounce tax on the cultivation of medical-only marijuana. At current wholesale prices of ~$ 1,500/lb, this is tantamount to a 10 percent tax on the value of marijuana. 

While NORML generally does not oppose the imposition of fair and reasonable sales taxes on the commercial sales of cannabis for recreational purposes, we do not support such excessive taxation on medical sales. Laws enacted by the legislature last year to regulate medical marijuana explicitly did not include additional taxation, and lawmakers should not try to impose such taxes now.
 
Enter your zip code below to contact your Senate/Assembly members and urge them to oppose this measure.

Additional information on these and other pending efforts is available from California NORML.

National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws – Advocacy Campaigns

Categories: Industrial Hemp Legislation | Tags: , , , , , , | Leave a comment

California: Lawmakers Shelve Bill To Impose Presumptive THC Impairment Standards

Members of the Assembly Appropriations Committee have rejected legislation that sought to presume impairment in drivers with trace levels of THC in their blood. NORML wishes to thank those of who contacted your state lawmakers opposing this effort.

Assembly Bill 2740, sought to “make it an offense for a person who has 5 ng/ml or more of delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol in his or her blood to drive a vehicle.”

The bill would have established a rebuttable presumption for this offense.

NORML is opposed to these proposed standards because the presence of low levels of THC in blood is an inappropriate and inconsistent indicator of psychomotor impairment. No less than the United States Traffic Highway Safety Administration (NHTSA) agrees, stating, “It is difficult to establish a relationship between a person’s THC blood or plasma concentration and performance impairing effects. … It is inadvisable to try and predict effects based on blood THC concentrations alone.” 

Separate Senate legislation that sought to expand the use of roadside oral swab testing was also tabled by lawmakers.

National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws – Advocacy Campaigns

Categories: Industrial Hemp Legislation | Tags: , , , , , , , | Leave a comment